Cybersecurity · Client requirements
Clients would rather read an honest ‘partially, fixed by March’ than a yes you can’t back up. Write the answers once, keep the evidence, and the next one takes an afternoon.
The same twenty topics every time
An honest ‘not yet’ beats a bluff
Build one answer file, reuse it
30 minutes of data collection, your report the next day, yours to keep with no obligation. Or pick a time on the calendar below. Or call 954-539-5678.
You know the type. A larger client, or a prospect you very much want, sends a spreadsheet with a hundred-odd security questions and a deadline next week. Some questions are clear (“Do you enforce multi-factor authentication?”), some are written for a bank (“Describe your segregation of duties within the SOC”), and all of them seem to want a yes.
Here is how I’d handle it. Answer every question truthfully, using “yes”, “partially” or “no”, with one or two sentences of detail. Where the answer is no, say what you’re doing about it and by when. Keep the answers, with evidence, in a single answer file you reuse for the next questionnaire. My firm opinion: an honest “not yet, planned by March” beats a yes you can’t back up. A false yes can come back to bite you the day there’s an incident or a claim, and it’s the sort of thing clients remember.
Whether a client writes its own or borrows from a standard like the Shared Assessments SIG or the Cloud Security Alliance’s CAIQ, the same topics appear again and again. If you can answer these well, you can answer most questionnaires.
Most of these map onto the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, which helps if a client asks which framework you follow. You don’t need to claim compliance with it; it’s enough to say you use it as a reference and can show how.
A “partially” with no detail invites suspicion. A “partially” with scope, reason and date reads as a vendor who knows its own systems. Here is the formula I’d use: what is covered, what isn’t, why, and when that changes.
Worked example. Imagine a 35-person marketing agency answering three common questions.
Notice that none of these are flattering, and all of them are believable. The third, frankly, is the one most small firms would be tempted to fudge, and the one a client’s security team is most likely to ask for a copy of. Our incident response plan template is a quick way to turn that no into a yes.
The second questionnaire takes half the time of the first, and the third takes an afternoon, provided you keep the answers somewhere sensible. This is the routine I’d set up for a client.
A written information security plan does a lot of this work for you, because many questions are effectively asking “show me the policy”.
If you want an independent view of where you stand before the next questionnaire arrives, our free Technology Health Assessment rates cybersecurity and business continuity in plain language: 30 minutes of data collection, a report the next day, yours to keep. Book a time here.
I wouldn’t let a salesperson fill it in alone. They want the deal, and the answers need to be right more than they need to be pleasant.
I wouldn’t answer “N/A” to questions you’d rather skip. If a question genuinely doesn’t apply (you have no server room), say why in a sentence.
And I wouldn’t treat the questionnaire as the end of it. Some clients write security requirements into their contracts, and cyber insurers ask similar questions at renewal. For what it’s worth, the firms that find questionnaires easy are the ones doing the underlying work: MFA, access reviews, same-day removal of leavers, tested restores and a written recovery plan. That’s the work our cybersecurity service covers, and we help clients with insurance and security questionnaires as part of it.
Book it now
Choose a slot that suits you. We’ll confirm by email, collect the data with you on the call, and send your report the next day. It’s free, and the report is yours to keep with no obligation.
Prefer to talk first? Call 954-539-5678, or send the form and we’ll contact you.
It’s a list of questions a client sends its suppliers to judge how well they protect data and systems. Some clients write their own; many use or borrow from standard ones such as the Shared Assessments SIG or the Cloud Security Alliance’s CAIQ. The topics overlap heavily: access, MFA, backups, encryption, training, incident response and third parties.
Sometimes, if a client has hard requirements such as MFA everywhere or a minimum level of cyber insurance. More often, gaps lead to follow-up questions or a timeline for fixes. Clients usually prefer an honest gap with a date to a yes they later find isn’t true.
No. Say ‘partially’ and explain the scope, for example ‘MFA is enforced for all Microsoft 365 users; two legacy systems do not yet support it and are scheduled for replacement by March 2027.’ That answer is accurate, and it shows you know your own environment.
Not for most small vendors. Large clients may ask for a SOC 2 report, but many accept a completed questionnaire, supporting policies and evidence such as screenshots. If a client insists on a certification you don’t hold, say so plainly rather than implying you have it.
Someone who knows the business, with whoever runs your IT. The owner or an operations manager should sign off, because the answers are a representation to a client and may end up referenced in the contract.