Automation & AI · Policy
Which tools to allow, what data never goes in, how output gets checked, plus sample clauses you can adapt.
Approved tools and accounts
Three simple data buckets
Sample clauses to adapt
30 minutes of data collection, your report the next day, yours to keep with no obligation. Or pick a time now. Or call 954-539-5678.
An AI acceptable use policy tells employees which AI tools they may use for work, what information they may never put into them, how AI output must be checked before it is used, and who to ask when unsure. For a small business it can fit on two pages. The core rules: use only approved tools on business accounts, never enter confidential client, employee or financial data into unapproved tools, review every output for accuracy, and disclose AI use where clients or rules require it.
This article is general information, not legal advice. If you work in a regulated field such as healthcare, law or finance, have counsel review your policy.
Your employees are almost certainly using AI already, often on personal accounts you cannot see. The risks are practical, not theoretical:
A short, clear policy lets people use AI productively while keeping sensitive data where it belongs.
Passwords, bank and card numbers, Social Security numbers, patient or health information, client files under confidentiality obligations, unreleased financials, employee personnel records.
Internal documents, client names and project details, draft contracts, customer emails, sales data. Only in company-approved tools under a business account.
Public information, generic writing help, brainstorming that contains no client or internal data, learning and research.
Three buckets are easier to follow than a long list of data types. Put examples from your own business in each one.
Two kinds of AI tools slip past most policies. Meeting notetakers join calls, record them and send transcripts to a third-party service, sometimes for every participant, including clients who never agreed. Browser extensions that summarize pages or rewrite emails can read everything on screen. Your policy should say whether notetakers are allowed, require participants to be told when a call is recorded, and ban unapproved extensions on work devices. Recording consent rules vary by state, so confirm the requirements with counsel.
Want to know where AI could help, and where it could leak data? Our free Technology Health Assessment takes about 30 minutes of data collection. The next day you get a plain-language report rating your cybersecurity, applications, automation and AI opportunities, with a short list of next steps in order. The report is yours to keep, with no obligation. Book your assessment.
Adapt these clauses to your business. Have counsel review them, especially in regulated industries.
A policy only helps if the technology backs it up and people understand it.
For a broader frame, NIST’s voluntary AI Risk Management Framework and its Generative AI Profile describe how to govern, map, measure and manage AI risk. Small businesses do not need the full framework, but its questions are useful for larger AI projects.
For ideas on productive uses, see practical AI uses for small business owners. JLB USA helps businesses put practical AI and automation to work, with the security controls that keep data in the right place.
Book it now
Choose a slot that suits you. We’ll confirm by email, collect the data with you on the call, and send your report the next day. It’s free, and the report is yours to keep with no obligation.
Prefer to talk first? Call 954-539-5678, or send the form and we’ll contact you.
Scope, approved tools, account rules, data classification, human review of output, disclosure, prohibited uses, security rules for AI apps, incident reporting and who owns the policy.
That is your decision. Many businesses allow only approved tools on company accounts, because business tiers usually offer stronger data terms than personal accounts.
Microsoft’s documentation states that prompts, responses and data accessed through Microsoft Graph are not used to train the foundation models used by Microsoft Copilot.
ABA Formal Opinion 512 addresses lawyers’ duties when using generative AI, including confidentiality and informed consent. Firms should have counsel review their policy against applicable rules.
At least twice a year, and whenever you add a new AI tool or a vendor changes its data terms.